首页> 外文OA文献 >Method development and validation for the determination of selected endocrine disrupting compounds by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and isotope pattern deconvolution in water samples. Comparison of two extraction techniques
【2h】

Method development and validation for the determination of selected endocrine disrupting compounds by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and isotope pattern deconvolution in water samples. Comparison of two extraction techniques

机译:通过液相色谱质谱法和水样中同位素模式反褶积法测定选定的内分泌干扰化合物的方法开发和验证。两种提取技术的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

n the present work two different extraction methodologies have been developed and validated for the determination of t-octylphenol (OP) and the technical mixture of nonylphenol (NP) (both, priority substances of EU Water Policy) and bisphenol A (BPA) in water samples. BPA has been quantified by isotope dilution mass spectrometry and isotope pattern deconvolution (IPD) for the first time taking advantage of 13C-isotopic analogues as internal standards, together with the previously studied alkylphenols. After preconcentration of the selected compounds, samples were analyzed by ultra high pressure liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). For this purpose two extraction methodologies were proposed and compared: a routine extraction methodology based on solid-phase extraction (SPE), and a non-conventional technique based on hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction (HF-LPME). The sought methodologies were satisfactorily validated in drinking water, surface water and effluent wastewater at two concentration levels, 0.1 and 1 µg/L for alkylphenols and 0.5 and 5 µg/L for BPA. Recoveries within 89-113% and 91-113% were obtained for HF-LPME and SPE respectively, with acceptable coefficients of variation in all cases according to SANCO guidelines. In addition, the use of isotope pattern deconvolution calculations provided the concentration of each analyte without the need to perform any calibration curve. Finally, a comparison of both methodologies is included, showing that while HF-LPME provides shorter sample preparation time and overall cost, SPE extraction and manipulation is highlighted as user friendly.
机译:在本工作中,开发了两种不同的萃取方法,并已验证了它们用于测定水中的叔辛基苯酚(OP)和壬基苯酚(NP)(均为欧盟水政策的优先物质)和双酚A(BPA)的技术混合物样品。 BPA首次通过同位素稀释质谱法和同位素模式反褶积(IPD)进行了定量分析,利用13C同位素类似物作为内标以及先前研究的烷基酚。对所选化合物进行预浓缩后,通过超高压液相色谱和串联质谱(UHPLC-MS / MS)分析样品。为此,提出并比较了两种萃取方法:基于固相萃取(SPE)的常规萃取方法和基于中空纤维液相微萃取(HF-LPME)的非常规技术。在饮用水,地表水和废水中两个浓度水平(烷基酚的浓度为0.1和1 µg / L,BPA的浓度为0.5和5 µg / L)中,令人满意地验证了所寻找的方法。 HF-LPME和SPE的回收率分别在89-113%和91-113%之间,根据SANCO指南,在所有情况下均具有可接受的变异系数。此外,使用同位素模式反褶积计算可提供每种分析物的浓度,而无需执行任何校准曲线。最后,对两种方法进行了比较,结果表明,虽然HF-LPME提供了更短的样品制备时间和总体成本,但SPE的提取和操作被认为是用户友好的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号